The single piece of vehicle technology owners rated highest this year is bolted to the outside of the car, in the sheet metal and plastic a collision damages first.
That's the finding buried in the JD Power 2026 U.S. Tech Experience Index, which Autobody News connected to the repair side on Sept. 1. Camera-based features led two of the study's five technology categories. In comfort and convenience, the winning technology was the camera rear-view mirror — the Cadillac Escalade among premium models, the Toyota Tundra among mass market. In driver assist, it was the blind spot camera, with the Genesis GV70 and the Hyundai Palisade taking the segment awards.
The study is not a small sample. JD Power surveyed 68,084 owners of new 2026 model-year vehicles after 90 days of ownership, fielding from June 2025 through May 2026, and scored 40 technologies on how widely a brand adopted each one and how well it executed.
Here's the part that lands in your bay: the features customers notice most, and complain loudest about when they stop working, are the ones your repair plan is most likely to disturb.
Those cameras sit in bumpers, mirrors and liftgates
A 360° camera system is not a single component in a protected spot. I-CAR's Repairability Technical Support documentation on understanding the 360° camera view system places the four cameras in the front bumper or grille, under the side rearview mirrors, and in the deck lid, liftgate, or tailgate. Every one of those locations is a routine collision repair.
The calibration trigger is broader than most estimates assume. I-CAR's typical calibration requirements for 360° camera view note that calibration of all the cameras is normally required after any one camera is replaced — and that the requirement can be set off when a camera, or the body component the camera attaches to, is removed, installed, replaced, or adjusted.
Read that again: removed. Not replaced. Pull a side mirror to get at a fender. Take a bumper cover off to reach a bracket. Drop a liftgate panel. The camera goes back on the same vehicle, the same part number, and the calibration requirement can still be live, because the mounting relationship you disturbed is exactly what the system was aimed against.
That's the single most common place a shop loses a calibration line — not on a sensor replacement, which everybody catches, but on a removal-and-reinstall that looked like it didn't touch anything electronic.
The volume and the paperwork don't line up
If calibration requirements are that broad, the estimating data should show it. It doesn't.
Repairify CEO Srisu Subrahmanyam estimates that roughly 65% of vehicles moving through collision shops require some form of calibration, and that only 35% to 40% of that work is actually being performed. Revv's ADAS Calibration Maturity Curve, published in March, landed on a similar number — 65% of repairs require at least one recalibration.
Now compare that to what shows up on paper. CCC Intelligent Solutions' 2026 Crash Course report put calibrations on 28.3% of repairable estimates. Enlyte's 2026 Envision Trends Report, drawing on Mitchell estimating data, found calibration penetration reaching 34.7% of estimates in 2025 — up sharply from 12.1% in 2022, and averaging $688 per estimate when a calibration was present.
So: roughly two out of three cars need it, and roughly one out of three estimates says so. Some of that gap is sublet work billed elsewhere. Some of it is timing. But a meaningful share of it is calibration that was required, wasn't identified, and left the shop uncorrected.
At $688 a line, that's a revenue problem. Given where those cameras sit, it's also a liability problem.
A clean scan is not proof the camera is aimed
The habit that hides the gap is treating a post-repair scan as the finish line. It isn't, and the people closest to the work keep saying so.
A camera aimed slightly off center can read its environment incorrectly with no warning to the driver and no code set. As Subrahmanyam put it, just because you see a blank screen doesn't mean your ADAS systems are perfectly fine.
John Melendez of JDM Collision & Calibrations in Thornton, Ill., made the same point in an Autobody News interview in June: fault codes only appear if the vehicle has detected a problem. They do not confirm that cameras, radar sensors, and other ADAS components are functioning within manufacturer specifications.
An absence of codes is an absence of evidence. It is not evidence of correct aim.
What It Means for Your Shop
Four concrete changes, and none of them require new equipment.
Add removal to your calibration trigger list. Most shops screen for replaced sensors. Screen for disturbed mounting locations too — side mirrors, bumper covers, grilles, doors, liftgates and tailgates on any vehicle with surround-view or blind spot camera systems. Build the question into the blueprint step, before the car is torn down, not after it's reassembled.
Pull the OEM requirement per VIN, every time. The triggers vary by manufacturer and by model year, and general guidance won't hold up if the repair is ever second-guessed. I-CAR's OEM calibration requirements search covers 2016 and newer vehicles and is the fastest way to get the specific answer on paper.
Document the outcome, not just the attempt. Save the pre- and post-scan, the calibration report with the target setup conditions, and the OEM procedure you followed. If your file says a calibration was performed but can't show it landed in spec, you have the same exposure as a shop that skipped it.
Price it as a line, not a courtesy. Calibration required by an OEM procedure is part of the repair. A removal-triggered calibration that never reaches the estimate is not a favor to the insurer — it's unbilled work on a safety system.
The Gap Won't Stay Invisible
The customers in that JD Power sample rated blind spot cameras and camera mirrors at the top because they use them daily. That familiarity cuts both ways: a driver who relies on a surround-view display will notice within a week if it reads wrong, and that complaint arrives with a repair order attached to it.
Vehicle technology is moving toward more sensors in more panels, not fewer. The shops that will be fine are the ones whose files can answer, per VIN, which calibrations the repair triggered, why, and what the result was — before anyone else asks the question.
Sources
- 2026 U.S. Tech Experience Index (TXI) Study — JD Power
- Technology Systems Rated Highest in JD Power's 2026 Tech Index Sit Where Collisions Happen — Autobody News, Sept. 1, 2026
- Understanding The 360° Camera View System — I-CAR RTS
- Typical Calibration Requirements For 360° Camera View — I-CAR RTS
- How To Use The OEM Calibration Requirements Search — I-CAR RTS
- ADAS Calibration in 2026: The Gap Between Getting It Done and Getting It Done Right — Autobody News
- New ADAS Maturity Framework Shows Most Shops' Bottleneck Isn't Equipment, It's Process — Autobody News
- CCC Crash Course 2026 Report Finds Higher Severity and Record Total Loss Frequency — CCC Intelligent Solutions
- Enlyte's 2026 Trends Report Tracks Climbing Calibration Costs — Autobody News
Working on something we should be covering? Send us the tip.